foto_articulo
22 October, 2026

Doritos Protein and protein claims in the European Union

In February 2026, PepsiCo launched Doritos Protein in the United States. The launch reopened the debate on how to transfer protein claims from one market to another. The product reached stores in March, in Nacho Cheese and Sweet & Tangy BBQ flavors. Each 28-gram serving contains 10 grams of protein. The company also announced an individual format with 17 grams.

The commercial interest is clear. A brand linked to conventional snacks enters the protein trend without repositioning the product as sports nutrition. For a potential launch in the European Union, the key question is how to adapt protein claims to the European nutritional rules.

That question requires working through three steps in order.

Step 1: What does the name Doritos Protein require in the EU?

In the European Union, Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 governs nutritional claims. Its Annex sets specific conditions for each type of claim. For protein claims, two thresholds apply.

The first is “source of protein.” This requires that at least 12% of the food’s energy value comes from protein. The second is “high in protein.” This one requires that proportion to reach at least 20%. These are not arbitrary percentages. They come from the energy contribution of proteins: 4 kcal per gram. Annex XIV of Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 establishes this conversion factor. Notably, the calculation applies to the total energy value of the product. The weight of the serving does not determine the threshold.

A product name including the word “protein” is not, technically, a regulated nutritional claim under European law. However, in practice, a competent authority can review whether the name creates an impression the product does not support. A competitor can do the same. For this reason, verifying the thresholds before choosing the name is the safest approach.

Step 2: Are 10 grams per serving enough to use the claim?

The U.S. Doritos Protein provides 10 grams of protein per 28-gram serving. The nutrition facts panel shows 150 kcal per serving. Fat contributes 81 kcal (9g), carbohydrates 52 kcal (13g), and protein 40 kcal (10g).

The European calculation is straightforward. Protein provides 40 kcal out of 150 kcal total. That gives 26.7% of the energy value from protein. This figure exceeds the 20% threshold for “high in protein.” Therefore, a product with this nutritional profile could use that claim under Regulation 1924/2006.

The key point is that protein claims do not transfer between regulatory systems word for word. In the United States, “good source of protein” is an informal commercial statement. It has no specific calculation threshold. In the European Union, by contrast, the claim must comply with the Annex to Regulation 1924/2006. Consequently, companies used to U.S. rules must verify the European calculation for each formulation. Assuming the claim transfers automatically is not a safe approach.

Step 3: What can the campaign promise?

If the formulation meets the European threshold, the brand can use “source of protein” or “high in protein.” The choice depends on the calculation results. These are the only claims the Annex to Regulation 1924/2006 recognizes for protein. Using other formulations, such as “protein-rich” or “loaded with protein,” requires separate verification. The regulation prohibits claims that the authorized list does not include.

Furthermore, the campaign can support the claim with serving size and protein grams. Those figures must match what the label declares. Nutritional information must remain consistent across the label, the product name, and all commercial communications.

Protein claims are decided before launch

The Doritos Protein case illustrates a recurring challenge in international food launches. The regulatory logic that works in one market does not automatically apply in another. In the European Union, protein claims have specific conditions. Companies must verify those conditions before the product reaches the shelf.

That verification is not a formality. It determines what the brand can say on the label, in advertising, and in digital channels. Moreover, a non-compliant claim can trigger official alerts and temporary withdrawals. Brand damage in a new market is another consequence.

Working out the claim calculation and reviewing the label comes first. Confirming that formulation and communication align is the prior step, not a reactive one.

Sources

Request an estimate

LET’S MAKE THE IMPOSSIBLE, POSSIBLE

Corporate video